Will Sheeley
AP Lit
5/3/13
“Love Poem with Toast”
The poem “Love Poem with Toast” written by Miller Williams is
a poem that points out the fact that wants are incredibly different from needs.
One needs to drink water to survive, one wants their soda poured over ice, but
in the end only one of these has a profound effect on one’s life. One can want
many things, but when all is said and done, is there really anything
substantial about these desires? Miller juxtaposes certain shallow wants next
to ones that will have a lasting effect on the world around them, such as comparing
wanting the water to boil and wanting to not have cancer. It points out the
futility of such thoughts, when all along they are, after all, only meaningless
desires, that distract one from actually acting, or enjoying what one already
has, at least until they are no more.
The poem itself is written with a
heavy emphasis on anaphora, with few rhymes interspersed throughout to add a rhythm
in certain parts. It forgoes traditional poetic structure and is written in
free-verse, in order to create a more compelling piece. Anaphora is used
somewhat commonly as shown through the first sentences of the first two
stanzas, they both culminate in “we do, we do”. Doing this portrays humans’
motivation to want one thing or another, to deny or accept. Wanting is also
used with anaphora, as it is the main theme of the poem. People want and want,
but in the end, they are going to die, and no matter how much they want one
thing or another it doesn’t really matter. Whether they are concerned with the
state of the planet, or they are concerned with color they painted their room,
in the end, man is alone. Williams also alternates the phrases “wanting not to”
and simply “wanting”. Showing no matter whether one wants something to happen,
or something not to happen, they are essentially the same exact thing. Williams
also uses metaphor to describe people almost as though they were breakfast
foods. By referring to “meat and bone” it is being ambiguous. The meat and bone
could just be another term for some sort of breakfast food; otherwise it can be
something of a disparaging description of the human body. It is only meat and
bone. One day, the remains will be gone, as well as who that person was, once
time has erased all traces of the people that existed.
This poem seems to combine its dark
meaning with its lighter title. It creates an image of a middle class couple,
sitting at their breakfast table, talking about what they want out of life,
generally thinking that in the end they will be together. But, inside each of
them, they know that when their life is to come to a close, it will be only
them, alone with their wants and desires that will fade and die with their
owners. But, these thoughts and concerns are kept hidden, while they continue
to go on about their daily adventures, trying to find a way to fulfill their
many desires. The poem itself seems as though it is the biting concern at the
back of one’s head, while they try to dismiss it and think of other,
meaningless things, to occupy their time and mind. It brings to the forefront,
the greatest concern of all existential thinkers; nihility. What point is there
to life if nothing matters in the end? It is a quandary, but one that is kept
hidden, and this denial makes life just seem easier.
Overall, this poem is very well
written, it does a good job of making a point that has been made before, but
adding some new perspectives to it. By giving the poem such a misleading,
cheerful, title it reflects the nature of mankind. Humans live their lives
concerned with matters that are, ultimately, trivial. What you ate for
breakfast, who you loved, or what you did with your life, will not matter once
time has erased all trace of life from the universe, and not even the planet is
left to tell the story of man’s existence
Hey Will!
ReplyDeleteI am going to comment on your essay, hope you don't mind!
I think that you overall did a very good job of writing about the meaning of this poem.
The details about the differences between needs and wants is a crucial part of this poem and really was represented well in your essay!
I agree that the title of the poem is rather misleading as well.
I would have liked to heard a little bit more about the existencial meaning of this poem because it would have been very interesting to read about that.
Over all you did a lovely job! :)